Additional Post---NOLA and the "Little things"

            Watching citizens of the Gulf Coast region persevere through the devastation of Hurricane Katrina makes you sit back and think about what’s truly important. So often people get caught up in material things that intrinsic values get lost. Watching Treme was one of many things that should have opened our eyes to this. The way they persevered without (much) money and with homes in ruins is very admirable. 

            With wind gusts up near 200 mph and the breaking of the levees, most houses didn’t stand much of a chance to retain its form. This destruction forced many people to the street with a loss of most of their possessions. However, we saw a great representation of how a good number of the population was able to—even if it was just a front—get passed these issues and focus on what made them happy.

            The first scene that was a good representation of this was the opening one when they are marching through the streets playing music. Even with the neighborhood in ruins, each of the musicians were smiling ear to ear, and the interaction with the taxi driver further proves that point. 

            One more scene when this is even more apparent is the one when John Goodman and his wife are at a restaurant conversing with a waitress. Amidst the conversation Goodman’s character says that what people care about is “food, companionship,” and food. Then the couple asks the woman a series of questions, and then brings up her home. She seemingly refutes the question and talks about what she can control and has fun doing. 

 

            These are a few examples of things that people who were/are on the outside looking in must admire. As bad as Hurricane Katrina was, this is only one example of situations that show individuals’ perseverance. Too many people—understandably to a point—depend on such luxuries to live a happy life. And seeing how these people were able to get past it and enjoy each other’s company is commendable. It’s these situations and the situations the people of New Orleans, Mississippi, and too many more places to mention that show there is a light at the end of the tunnel in all-bad situations. This is something we all need to realize and cherish the little things opposed to the material goods.

Post #10: Hurricane Katrina and media influence

      Stereotypes come from all over the place. However, we can thank news reporting for a good share of these points of view. They can find a way to spin a story or perspective to tarnish individual’s reputations; and the African American community of New Orleans was the group affected most. Whether it was stories that were reported, stories that were spun a different way, or even stories that never brought public, news media shed a bad light on many people.

      Though there were various things that were twisted somewhere along the line, arguably the most heinous of them was the situation with looters. It is true that some of the people were taking stuff to turn a profit, but the fact of the matter is that the vast majority of them were doing so to provide healthcare or food for those who needed it. However, that’s definitely not what the media decided to air. Instead we saw middle-aged black males carrying out large TV’s or bikes, etc—things you’d think to be pretty useless in comparison to what they could have taken. In addition to the looting was the confrontations that were publicized. Going back to Spike Lee’s film, he entered a piece of the news showing isolated instances of police/civilian altercations, again ignoring the people helping the wounded, and good deeds being done.

      Two of the main issues we’ve talked about in this course are choice and visibility. Both of these are definitely controlled by the media at one time or another. It’s tragic because these two elements are key factors to controlling social justice.

      Media correlates with choice because it’s everywhere. Billboards, radio, television, and any other way they can do it, they can manipulate the way we think about things. In this situation, the way it happened, the African American community was shown in a very dark light, which perpetuates the cycle of injustice.

      Visibility becomes part of the picture because with all of its ability to make things public knowledge, there was still the lack of coverage over those who need their voices heard. The neighborhoods that need(ed) to most help were off to the side struggling to bring everything together.  

     The sad truth is that we can continuously say that something needs to change, but in the end saying that something needs to change is not good enough by itself. We can only hope that thru movements and other actions, social injustices will diminish and everyone can resolve differences; which to me will ultimately help the process.

Post #9: "When the Levees Broke"

      Watching Spike Lee’s “When the Levees Broke” really opened my eyes more than I feel that reading a book could have.  All of the information that a book can bring is very beneficial, but nothing (aside from being there in person) can provide what videos can. From the visual documentations of the levees breaking, to the first hand accounts of survivors, each piece was enlightening. 

      The government’s intervention time—or lack there of—was also very apparent, we were able to see how there were desperate calls for help that went unanswered. It was very humorous (albeit in a gloomy way) when a spokesmen for a respondent team appeared on a CNN show making up facts and excuses while blatantly denying any wrongdoings when evidence pointed to the contrary. This is just another example of how major entities try to cover up poor work practices in an effort to save face at all costs.

      One topic after watching and discussing the film stood out to me. There is the point in the film when there was numerous human dead bodies shown and then an image of a dog (can’t totally recall whether it too was dead or just harmed) in downtown New Orleans. The class reaction to the human bodies was silence, but once the animal is shown there is unanimous verbal sadness. There was even an instance when Soledad O’Brien, a reporter for CNN, was on the streets and saw a dead body lying there, and when she came back the next day the body was still lying there just covered up. Another example of whether it be wrongful priorities or turning a blind eye to the needy, there are far too many examples of horrific happenings.

             I wish I could say that the reaction to the harmed animal surprised me, but it honestly didn’t. Maybe it’s because all we have to do is turn on Law & Order to see graphic portrayals of humans’ dead. It symbolizes how people can accept human loss, but when they see an animal harmed all hell breaks loose.  

Another Post-Katrina thing that is disheartening was the fact that there were bus tours going through the neighborhoods seeing all of the damage and while they were still in shambles. I can see how this is very appalling to people hearing that there are people making financial gains over their troubles. Also, we saw that many of these “tourists” wouldn’t even get out of their busses to see the damage—this is the part that I found most disturbing. But when looking on the other hand, if this is a way that money can be gained to even potentially help re-built the economy, I can understand. 

 

Prompt #8: CIW and Via Campensia

      In an effort to improve working conditions and wages amongst individuals who are exposed to such a horrible environment, there are many groups that speak out and attempt to draw attention to the corporations at fault. Two groups that are recognized greatly are the Coalition of Immokalee Workers (C.I.W.) and La Via Campensia. Even though they are based out of different areas and have slightly different goals, both groups are largely fighting the same fight. Additionally, both are tackling injustice in different ways.

       The C.I.W. —which is a non-profit organization—advocates and pushes for large corporations to raise the wages and working conditions for those picking tomatoes that ultimately end up with major corporations. One of the ways they’ve accomplished much of what they have is through the “Campaign for Fair Food.” As it says on their websites mission statement, they “want major buyers of tomatoes to pay a premium of one penny more per pound for their tomatoes.” Though this they’ve come to agreements with fast food chains such as McDonald’s and Taco Bell to help increase pay.

            Corporations universally lowball illegal immigrants—a population that makes up a large portion of these workers—because truthfully they aren’t able to have much voice. However, in this case it’s a double-edged sword. Yes, illegal immigrants aren’t entitled to standard wages, but to the contrary, these corporations aren’t legally allowed to employ them. This conflict is what corporations rely on…illegal immigrants keeping quiet on treatment and pay.

      Via Campensia is a movement (which includes upwards of 100 organizations) that focuses more on individuals’ rights to produce. It was this group that coined the phrase, “food sovereignty.” By this they were--and continue--to give individuals the rights to legally grow and produce crops on their own land. This fight is so crucial because as their website states: “It is based on the conviction that small farmers, including peasant fisher-folk, pastoralists and   indigenous people, who make up almost half the world's people, are capable of producing food for their communities and feeding the world in a sustainable and healthy way.”

         Elaborating on this, the price of purchasing food and other necessities from corporations is WAY more expensive than the cost of utilizing your own land to survive.

         Both groups rely on many things to get their points across, but none is more important than the sheer number of individuals that are involved in these movements. Each represents well over 100 million people. And by making each of these voices heard, the pressure will continue to rise. Both are becoming a disruption by making so much of this injustice public knowledge rather than have major corporations hide their wrongdoings. However, like we saw with the Taco Bell case –when the CEO claimed to have zero knowledge of such treatment—equal rights is definitely hard to come by in these instances. 

Extra Credit Blog--Food, Inc.

1. I take the statement to be admittance or bringing to light how a lot of times what we are eating isn't always 100% authentic, and by saying they are producing "food" not just "chicken" they are going for flavor and not always authenticity.

2. When we are eating so much of one thing we aren’t getting all of the different nutrients we need to lead a health and full life.

3. I feel this statement is very true to society today. Dollar and value menus are perfect examples of it. The fact that you can get a larger quantity for paying a lot less is a necessity to many people. When he says, “we don’t understand the price that’s being paid,” it shows that consumers aren’t always aware of work conditions and production.

4. It’s hard to say that price should or shouldn’t be the driving force in the industry. Like in the numerous examples we’ve seen and read about, the large corporations are making billions by selling such a large quantity at discounted prices, and we (consumers) are the beneficiaries because it isn’t taking as much of a toll on our wallet. But, like Taco Bell, producers are getting shafted. On the opposite end, as cheap as this food is, we know that it isn’t too healthy. Expanding on this, if you want to find healthier diets, you are likelier to need to spend more money; money which some people aren’t privileged to.

5. The thought of this is gut-wrenching to me, and I’m lucky enough to not have many traditions that are based off finances. If I was told that’s run in my family for generations could no longer be practiced then I’d be lost. But more importantly you’d feel for the previous family members as well.

6. It almost puzzles me as to why many producers don’t want to advertise what is in their products. Maybe it’s due to being able to replicate products that would hurt sales. But at the same time consumers need to have knowledge on what they are buying and putting into their everyday lives.

7. Yes and No. It does mention bits and pieces about these issues, and covers these issues and brings light to them, but it doesn’t feel like it’s a complete central focus.

8. Can't help but be a little grossed out my some of the things shown. I do feel that there could have been a little more depth into some of the issues.